Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lipiflow & IPL Success Rates (Pros/Cons?)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Kabuto View Post

    Thanks! So do you guys all agree Lipiflow is better due to being less invasive? (Less invasive than IPL for example?)
    I try to think what could happen worst case scenario...for me, it would be a corneal abrasion with lipiflow because of the cups that go on your eyeball. So that's not great but not a big deal. IPL can cause a burn and permenant damage. Probing you could damage the gland permenantly. That's why I personally rank them like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Kabuto View Post

    So if I’m not mistaken, it sounds like IPL or Lipiflow could be equally good going in and it’s impossible to know ahead of time which will work better? Are they pretty much equally good choices?
    Do warm compresses help you at all? If you're doing them correctly and they don't offer relief, I don't see how lipiflow would offer relief.

    I had a lipview done. I know the status of my glands, all are in tact except two, they are dilated and sluggish and produce a foamy meibum. I also don't blink fully.

    Knowing these things will help you decide which avenue to pursue.

    I really want to do lipiflow because I feel I could get a "deeper cleaning" of the gland. Because the machine heats and expresses at the same time. I don't think IPL or proving would benefit me. On the contrary, they may do more harm for me personally. I will not even think about IPL or probing until I've exhausted all other options. I'm disqualified from lipiflow because of my dystrophy...my next step would be doxycycline. You could say I'm lucky in that sense.

    I think you need more more information about your condition before you can decide. Maybe I missed it though...

    Leave a comment:


  • Kabuto
    replied
    Originally posted by farmgirl View Post
    My Dr does both and says that he prefers IPL because he feels he gets better results with it than lipiflow. He said that if it were not for the fact that he has some people who swear by Lipiflow he would discontinue that treatment and stick with IPL. This goes to show that we are all different and we respond differently to different things.

    It was not at all invasive but the expression part was not what you would call comfortable, rather it was something to be tolerated. I have gone for one treatment but am scheduled for 4. He said that probing shouldn't be necessary with IPL because it softens the oils so well and they only do it if there are glands that refuse to express after several treatments. The cost is about $500 per treatment in Canada at this office.

    The only contraindication that I am aware of is you cannot do it to dark skinned people but I am not sure how dark is 'dark'. They have you fill out a form to determine your skin type and then they go from there.
    So if I’m not mistaken, it sounds like IPL or Lipiflow could be equally good going in and it’s impossible to know ahead of time which will work better? Are they pretty much equally good choices?

    Leave a comment:


  • farmgirl
    replied
    My Dr does both and says that he prefers IPL because he feels he gets better results with it than lipiflow. He said that if it were not for the fact that he has some people who swear by Lipiflow he would discontinue that treatment and stick with IPL. This goes to show that we are all different and we respond differently to different things.

    It was not at all invasive but the expression part was not what you would call comfortable, rather it was something to be tolerated. I have gone for one treatment but am scheduled for 4. He said that probing shouldn't be necessary with IPL because it softens the oils so well and they only do it if there are glands that refuse to express after several treatments. The cost is about $500 per treatment in Canada at this office.

    The only contraindication that I am aware of is you cannot do it to dark skinned people but I am not sure how dark is 'dark'. They have you fill out a form to determine your skin type and then they go from there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kabuto
    replied
    Originally posted by Dowork123 View Post
    I have not done either procedure, so let me preface with that. But I have MGD and EBMD...so my next steps would be lipiflow, Ipl or probing...so I've thought about them all. I am disqualified from lipiflow because of the dystrophy, however if I weren't, this would be my first choice because it seems least invasive AND hot compresses work really well for me. Next would be ill because it's less invasive, however, finding someone who knows how to do this is important. Finally proving, and the same goes for that, you gotta find someone experienced to do this.

    Good luck.
    Thanks! So do you guys all agree Lipiflow is better due to being less invasive? (Less invasive than IPL for example?)

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    I have not done either procedure, so let me preface with that. But I have MGD and EBMD...so my next steps would be lipiflow, Ipl or probing...so I've thought about them all. I am disqualified from lipiflow because of the dystrophy, however if I weren't, this would be my first choice because it seems least invasive AND hot compresses work really well for me. Next would be ill because it's less invasive, however, finding someone who knows how to do this is important. Finally proving, and the same goes for that, you gotta find someone experienced to do this.

    Good luck.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kabuto
    replied
    I suppose I find myself wondering what to do. To opt for Lipiflow or find someone who does IPL. (Or is there anything even better?)

    Leave a comment:


  • diydry
    replied
    Hi, if you search the forums I think you'll find lots of discussion and comparisons between the two procedures. The most likely reason your doctor recommended Lipiflow is because it's more widely available in general practice, is FDA approved, and has benefited from more aggressive marketing. By contrast, IPL to treat MGD is an off-label use and is typically found in academic dry eye clinics. However, from what I understand IPL can work better than Lipiflow for some patients but it also takes several months to complete the treatment regime. However I doubt so many dry eye specialists would be performing IPL over Lipiflow if they did not feel their patients were seeing results. I did Lipiflow because it was quick and available (but expensive...) but once I have a better idea of what city I'll be living for a while I'll look into doing IPL.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kabuto
    started a topic Lipiflow & IPL Success Rates (Pros/Cons?)

    Lipiflow & IPL Success Rates (Pros/Cons?)

    Hi all,

    Considering Lipiflow or IPL. Already read the article explaining both. My doctor recommended Lipiflow specifically- I wonder why. She didn’t mention IPL, I learned about that procedure here.

    Any way that I can find out more information? Thanks so much!
Working...
X