I'm in a bit of a dilemma. I've had the common symptoms of dry eyes for around the past 20 years....blepharitus and reduced oil secretion. My left eye is in worse shape than my right (2mm vs 11mm on the dry eye strip test) and it has always been this way. Back in my hard contact lens days I suffered a pretty bad scratch and was put on Muro ointment. After I healed I felt so much better in the mornings that I have continued to use Muro for the last 20 years on a daily basis. Compared to other ointments, such as Lacrilube, for me there is no comparison, and even though it is 5% hypertonic I don't suffer any burning at all. I'm not sure it is the hypertonic solution that is helping because I've noticed that the Muro formulation is not like Lacrilube in that it contains a modified lanolin. I suspect the lanolin might be why it seems to protect my eye better at night. Now I'm seeing a new Opthomologist, a corneal surgeon in Sydney, who I have a lot of confidence and respect for. When I told her about my Muro use she got rather bothered by this and has told me I really should stop! Her reasoning is that Muro is for corneal edema. In other words the hypertonic nature would be to draw moisture out of the cornea, so how could that "help" dry eyes. So, for two weeks now I've tried to stop Muro and have tried two other ointments, Lacrilube and Ircal. They work a bit for me but I just feel so much better with the Muro. It's about feeling better isn't it? Theory is theory, but should I care? I can't quite imagine I'm hurting myself using Muro though maybe someone can set me straight! Thanks for any suggestions.
Also, if anyone can tell me of an ointment with a similar composition to Muro, but with out the hypertonicity, I'd be most appreciative.
Also, if anyone can tell me of an ointment with a similar composition to Muro, but with out the hypertonicity, I'd be most appreciative.
Comment