Hi all. It's been awhile. Life has been crazy. Apparently crazy enough to induce my latest flare-up. Couldn't take it anymore so made the appointment.
History--my docs last year only wanted to plug the top ducts, since they take a more cautious approach (this, I can definitely appreciate). Couldn't plug one top duct because it was so small, so they cauterized it, and it popped open over this past year. A plug is still in the top of other eye.
This flare-up was bad enough to warrant another approach. So today, I got the bottom ones plugged with the Eagle, smooth top plugs. So far so good.
But they didn't want to re-cauterize the top left one--which is in fact the worst one. The right eye that is double plugged feels good so far. Left eye, ok, but could be a lot better I think (yes! I am tear greedy!).
Have any of you with either all four plugged or cauterized had any bad experiences, with inflammation or otherwise? I read somewhere about the "backup inflammation" phenomenon, but am not sure of the truth of it. I trust my doctors who have been very cautious so far but would like to make the case next visit to go ahead and cauterize that top one.
BTW, I am aqueous deficient. Lipid profile, etc., looks good according to last evaluation. Thanks for any suggestions, personal experiences.
History--my docs last year only wanted to plug the top ducts, since they take a more cautious approach (this, I can definitely appreciate). Couldn't plug one top duct because it was so small, so they cauterized it, and it popped open over this past year. A plug is still in the top of other eye.
This flare-up was bad enough to warrant another approach. So today, I got the bottom ones plugged with the Eagle, smooth top plugs. So far so good.
But they didn't want to re-cauterize the top left one--which is in fact the worst one. The right eye that is double plugged feels good so far. Left eye, ok, but could be a lot better I think (yes! I am tear greedy!).
Have any of you with either all four plugged or cauterized had any bad experiences, with inflammation or otherwise? I read somewhere about the "backup inflammation" phenomenon, but am not sure of the truth of it. I trust my doctors who have been very cautious so far but would like to make the case next visit to go ahead and cauterize that top one.
BTW, I am aqueous deficient. Lipid profile, etc., looks good according to last evaluation. Thanks for any suggestions, personal experiences.

)
) I feel like giving them very specific measures of an improvement (particularly if they can't see for themselves improvements in things like Schirmer's scores or TBUT etc.), helps them justify in their own minds why they should do this to you (ie. cauterize your puncta).


Comment