Hello all,
I very grateful to be here.
My story - I'm currently struggling to decide my next course of action.
To cut a long story short. I suffered from large erosion back in June 2016 after having LASEK in Mar 2016 (famous high street brand). The erosion cost me two weeks of work. After undergoing a protocol of lubrications and compresses I did not have any further erosions, but have suffered from the dryness sensations (burning, grittiness, soreness) and found it very difficult to work. Seeking a second opinion the conclusion was blepharitis causing an inadequate lipid layer (TBUT 6 seconds and Schirmers 24). Going back to my original surgeon, he dismissed the dry eye issues and performed a test to see if my epithelium was loose (cotton bud touching the epithelium to see if it heaps). My eyes tested positive for RCE according to him and I needed PTK. He believed I was not experiencing dryness, moreover a dryness sensation from a loose epithelium touching the nerves.
I did see an independent Professor and he advised against PTK and dismissed the loose epithelium test. He suggested antibiotics and omega 3. I decided to take this route as I was not keen on undergoing another surgical procedure at the time.
Fast forward to last week – May 6th 2017 I had another corneal erosion and the Professor is now agreeing I have recurrent corneal erosions, but advised on having Anterior Stromal Puncture immediately.
Conflicting views between surgeons has left me very confused and desperate.
My key challenges are:
Many thanks for reading.
I very grateful to be here.
My story - I'm currently struggling to decide my next course of action.
To cut a long story short. I suffered from large erosion back in June 2016 after having LASEK in Mar 2016 (famous high street brand). The erosion cost me two weeks of work. After undergoing a protocol of lubrications and compresses I did not have any further erosions, but have suffered from the dryness sensations (burning, grittiness, soreness) and found it very difficult to work. Seeking a second opinion the conclusion was blepharitis causing an inadequate lipid layer (TBUT 6 seconds and Schirmers 24). Going back to my original surgeon, he dismissed the dry eye issues and performed a test to see if my epithelium was loose (cotton bud touching the epithelium to see if it heaps). My eyes tested positive for RCE according to him and I needed PTK. He believed I was not experiencing dryness, moreover a dryness sensation from a loose epithelium touching the nerves.
I did see an independent Professor and he advised against PTK and dismissed the loose epithelium test. He suggested antibiotics and omega 3. I decided to take this route as I was not keen on undergoing another surgical procedure at the time.
Fast forward to last week – May 6th 2017 I had another corneal erosion and the Professor is now agreeing I have recurrent corneal erosions, but advised on having Anterior Stromal Puncture immediately.
Conflicting views between surgeons has left me very confused and desperate.
My key challenges are:
- Deciding PTK vs. Anterior Stromal Puncture
- Starting a new job next June (my last company was very lenient and flexible). I work in corporate finance so I'll be on the screen all day and I fear the dryness will impact my ability to earn and support my family
- New born baby - Just had my second child and I cannot help with any of the late feeding in fear that my eyes will suffer too much from lack of sleep. It's hard to watch my wife do it all.
Many thanks for reading.
Comment