Tweet
Hello everyone. I am glad to have found this community and wanted to introduce myself by sharing my full story in hopes it helps someone on their own research journey, or perhaps informs a doctor who comes across it about technologies that exist.
A little background on how I got here. During my two years of searching for answers, I found the Big Fat Scleral Lenses Facebook group, which I understand is connected to the Dry Eye Foundation that runs this forum. That group was genuinely pivotal in my journey. It was only later that I discovered this forum exists, and I realized it goes so much more into detail than anything I had found before. I wish I had found it sooner, and I am posting now because I want my story to be here for anyone who finds their way to this community while searching for answers the way I once was.
A note on forum etiquette: I am a patient sharing my personal experience, not promoting any product or doctor. I will refer to the specific technology I used by name once for informational purposes, as it may help others in their research, but my goal is simply to share what worked for me.
Who I am and why I am posting here
I was ultimately diagnosed with Bilateral Irregular Astigmatism, a condition that causes Higher Order Aberrations, microscopic imperfections in the way light travels through the eye that standard glasses and soft contacts simply cannot correct. I never had LASIK. I have never had any eye surgery. Every doctor I saw throughout my journey asked me immediately whether I had, because my symptoms matched post-LASIK complications so closely. Each of them was puzzled when I said no.
From what I have researched, HOA symptoms are extremely common in post-LASIK patients and in people with conditions like keratoconus, but they also can absolutely occur without any prior eye surgery, particularly in patients with irregular astigmatism. Most eye exams do not test for them. Many doctors are not equipped to diagnose or treat them properly. I believe this happens far more often than is currently recognized, especially as screen time increases across all of our lives.
Reflecting on my history, I also believe I have likely had some degree of HOAs for much of my adult life. I have never seen well in glasses, always saw better in contacts, always had glare and sharpness issues, and always felt held back by standard correction. The symptoms worsened over time with age and screen exposure until they became impossible to ignore. My condition also appears to be hereditary, my mother had similar symptoms, and I have four daughters whose visual health I think about carefully as a result.
My symptoms
Holiday season of 2024. Driving at night, every light source exploding into starbursts and halos. Headlights, streetlights, holiday decorations, all of it blooming and scattering in ways that made nighttime driving feel genuinely unsafe. Spring 2025, overwhelming daytime glare at the beach. By late 2025, ghosting and blur on my computer screen were affecting my work in real and measurable ways.
I was concerned enough to quietly research cataracts and Fuchs dystrophy for weeks. I talked to some close friends about it during this period; they were wonderfully supportive, though I think my own fears were contagious and they tended to share my concern about the more serious possibilities. Sometimes just having people in your corner is what you need, even when none of you have the answers yet.
The doctor journey — and why second opinions matter
Be your own best advocate. Get second opinions. Trust your instincts. You know your symptoms better than anyone. I am so glad I kept pushing.
I started at a well-regarded local in-network practice with both an optometrist and an ophthalmologist. The ophthalmologist was genuinely thorough; he had the technology and the clinical experience to definitively rule out cataracts and Fuchs dystrophy, which gave me real relief. He also introduced me to Higher Order Aberrations and suspected that was the root of my symptoms. He took an additional step that showed genuine clinical effort: he focused carefully on my pupil size and behavior, and ultimately prescribed a medication to restrict my pupils in hopes of reducing my symptoms. The reasoning behind this approach is sound, as smaller pupils can limit the area through which light passes and reduce the impact of HOAs. The medication, however, was not right for me. After taking it, I could not see well for approximately two hours, which was unsettling enough that I was unwilling to continue down that path. That experience was ultimately what pushed me to seek a second opinion.
The optometrist at the same practice suggested scleral lenses were too expensive and not worth pursuing, advice I now know reflected an outdated view of where this technology stands today.
Through my own research I found a corneal specialist and sought a second opinion through my medical insurance. Even though the previous doctor had already ruled out the serious conditions competently, the second opinion brought something entirely new to the table. This specialist performed a fluorescein dye test and identified in real time that my tear ducts were not functioning properly. New diagnosis: dry eyes, likely from years of soft contact lens wear and heavy screen use, worsening my HOAs. And a referral to a specialty contact lens practice.
Second opinions matter. The right doctor at the right time changes everything.
The dry eye detour, finding community, and the hesitation phase
After the dry eye diagnosis, I spent months trying to fix things on my own: warm compresses morning and night, fish oil, switching to glasses more, reducing screen time, and every eye drop I could research. I even examined all medications I was taking, including finasteride, and stopped taking it for over a month to see if it was contributing to my symptoms. It made no difference. Nothing meaningfully moved the needle.
Even with a referral to a specialty contact lens practice in hand, I did not immediately follow through. The concerns stacked up: the costs would be significant, potentially several thousand dollars out of pocket in total. Most specialty practices are out-of-network by default. Insurance coverage would be difficult to obtain. It would require multiple visits. The practice required a significant commute from where I live. And from everything I was hearing, wavefront HOA correction technology does not appear to be covered by insurance currently. I kept trying dry eye treatments instead, and I wish I had pushed through those hesitations sooner.
During this period I found the Big Fat Scleral Lenses Facebook group, which as I mentioned was a genuine turning point. Real patients from around the world dealing with HOAs alongside dry eye and other conditions, sharing what had worked and what had not. The success stories there, particularly around scleral lenses and wavefront-guided HOA correction, gave me both direction and hope at a point when I had very little of either. If you are not already a member, I would strongly recommend it.
One thing that became clear through all this research: a stable scleral lens fit is a required foundation before wavefront HOA correction can be added. This is not just a preference; it is fundamental to how the process works. The scleral lens has to come first, and it has to be right.
I eventually made the call to the specialty practice, spoke with someone at the front desk who put me completely at ease, talked it through with my wife, and committed.
If you are sitting in that hesitation phase right now: go make the appointment.
What happened at the specialty practice
My first appointment was late December 2025. The initial exam was nearly two hours of focused one-on-one time, unlike anything I had experienced in eye care. I was scanned with a wavefront aberrometer (OVITZ xwave) at that very first appointment, showing my initial HOA readings in roughly the .5 to .8 range depending on the measurement and the trial lenses being evaluated.
My doctor took the approach this process requires: establish a stable base scleral lens first, then add the wavefront HOA correction once that foundation is solid. Over several visits and fitting revisions, she worked to minimize the HOA readings as much as possible before any correction was added. After that iterative process, we reached a stable scleral fit with readings settling in the .5 range. The sclerals alone made a meaningful difference, as nighttime starbursts and halos reduced significantly and daytime glare improved considerably. But residual starbursts remained and the computer ghosting persisted.
With the base fit confirmed stable, my doctor recommended adding wavefront HOA correction to the lenses. She also set my expectations honestly throughout, including noting that my HOA levels, while meaningful, were not as severe as many of the cases she had treated, so results might be more modest than the dramatic improvements some patients experience. She also told me the first corrected pair would likely need further adjustment.
First corrected pair: vision too blurry, needed additional corrections beyond the HOA optics, as standard astigmatism and eye power corrections also needed to be incorporated. Real disappointment, even with the expectation having been set. Went back, my doctor identified what was needed, new pair ordered.
Second corrected pair: transformative. Night vision completely changed. Daytime glare gone. Computer ghosting entirely gone. I should also note that there is a real acclimation period as your brain adjusts to the new visual input. My vision continued to improve over the first one to three weeks of wearing the corrected lenses, so patience is important here as well.
Latest aberrometry scan May 2026: HOAs under .20. Lab confirmed no further correction possible without introducing new aberrations. Testing at 20/15, the best vision of my life. Total visits: 4 to 5 spread over several months.
One important note on testing: some light sources produce halos and starbursts for most people, particularly those with any degree of astigmatism. Test across many different lighting situations before drawing conclusions on new lenses.
On the conservative treatment approach
At various points more aggressive surgical options could have come up. I am glad I went conservative. The daily commitment of specialty contact lenses is real, as acclimation takes time even as a lifelong contact wearer, but there was no risky irreversible procedure involved. The lenses can be updated and improved as the technology continues to advance. For me, that is the right tradeoff, and I would encourage anyone weighing options to think carefully about it.
The biggest surprise about scleral lenses I did not anticipate: how genuinely comfortable they are to wear. After the acclimation period they feel completely natural and I can wear them the entire day without issue. The insertion and extraction routine has become second nature.
The insurance reality
Most specialty contact lens practices are out-of-network with vision insurance by default. Even with a formal Letter of Medical Necessity and a diagnosed medical condition like Bilateral Irregular Astigmatism, expect minimal reimbursement and a real fight to get even that.
I want to be clear about something important: I went in-network first. I spent nearly a year at a vision insurance in-network provider before ultimately being referred to a specialty practice that was out-of-network. The in-network provider was genuinely trying to help but simply did not have the specialized equipment required to diagnose and treat my condition properly. That is a critical point that gets lost in the insurance conversation, being in-network does not mean being equipped to treat every condition a plan covers. On some of my previous posts about my story, some doctors have posted that this is a tough reality of the situation.
My vision insurance denied virtually everything despite a formal Letter of Medical Necessity. After a formal internal appeal they offered a token amount toward the total claim. I did not cash that check. I filed formal complaints with consumer protection bodies and notified my employer's benefits team. I want better outcomes for everyone facing this situation, not just myself.From what I have heard, wavefront HOA correction technology does not appear to be covered by insurance currently. I hope that can change. Plan for scleral lenses to be an ongoing annual replacement cost of approximately $1,000 or more. The insurance conversation does not end when you get your first pair.
Do not let cost be the reason you continue to suffer. The quality of life on the other side of this treatment is worth it.
What I want you to take away
A little background on how I got here. During my two years of searching for answers, I found the Big Fat Scleral Lenses Facebook group, which I understand is connected to the Dry Eye Foundation that runs this forum. That group was genuinely pivotal in my journey. It was only later that I discovered this forum exists, and I realized it goes so much more into detail than anything I had found before. I wish I had found it sooner, and I am posting now because I want my story to be here for anyone who finds their way to this community while searching for answers the way I once was.
A note on forum etiquette: I am a patient sharing my personal experience, not promoting any product or doctor. I will refer to the specific technology I used by name once for informational purposes, as it may help others in their research, but my goal is simply to share what worked for me.
Who I am and why I am posting here
I was ultimately diagnosed with Bilateral Irregular Astigmatism, a condition that causes Higher Order Aberrations, microscopic imperfections in the way light travels through the eye that standard glasses and soft contacts simply cannot correct. I never had LASIK. I have never had any eye surgery. Every doctor I saw throughout my journey asked me immediately whether I had, because my symptoms matched post-LASIK complications so closely. Each of them was puzzled when I said no.
From what I have researched, HOA symptoms are extremely common in post-LASIK patients and in people with conditions like keratoconus, but they also can absolutely occur without any prior eye surgery, particularly in patients with irregular astigmatism. Most eye exams do not test for them. Many doctors are not equipped to diagnose or treat them properly. I believe this happens far more often than is currently recognized, especially as screen time increases across all of our lives.
Reflecting on my history, I also believe I have likely had some degree of HOAs for much of my adult life. I have never seen well in glasses, always saw better in contacts, always had glare and sharpness issues, and always felt held back by standard correction. The symptoms worsened over time with age and screen exposure until they became impossible to ignore. My condition also appears to be hereditary, my mother had similar symptoms, and I have four daughters whose visual health I think about carefully as a result.
My symptoms
Holiday season of 2024. Driving at night, every light source exploding into starbursts and halos. Headlights, streetlights, holiday decorations, all of it blooming and scattering in ways that made nighttime driving feel genuinely unsafe. Spring 2025, overwhelming daytime glare at the beach. By late 2025, ghosting and blur on my computer screen were affecting my work in real and measurable ways.
I was concerned enough to quietly research cataracts and Fuchs dystrophy for weeks. I talked to some close friends about it during this period; they were wonderfully supportive, though I think my own fears were contagious and they tended to share my concern about the more serious possibilities. Sometimes just having people in your corner is what you need, even when none of you have the answers yet.
The doctor journey — and why second opinions matter
Be your own best advocate. Get second opinions. Trust your instincts. You know your symptoms better than anyone. I am so glad I kept pushing.
I started at a well-regarded local in-network practice with both an optometrist and an ophthalmologist. The ophthalmologist was genuinely thorough; he had the technology and the clinical experience to definitively rule out cataracts and Fuchs dystrophy, which gave me real relief. He also introduced me to Higher Order Aberrations and suspected that was the root of my symptoms. He took an additional step that showed genuine clinical effort: he focused carefully on my pupil size and behavior, and ultimately prescribed a medication to restrict my pupils in hopes of reducing my symptoms. The reasoning behind this approach is sound, as smaller pupils can limit the area through which light passes and reduce the impact of HOAs. The medication, however, was not right for me. After taking it, I could not see well for approximately two hours, which was unsettling enough that I was unwilling to continue down that path. That experience was ultimately what pushed me to seek a second opinion.
The optometrist at the same practice suggested scleral lenses were too expensive and not worth pursuing, advice I now know reflected an outdated view of where this technology stands today.
Through my own research I found a corneal specialist and sought a second opinion through my medical insurance. Even though the previous doctor had already ruled out the serious conditions competently, the second opinion brought something entirely new to the table. This specialist performed a fluorescein dye test and identified in real time that my tear ducts were not functioning properly. New diagnosis: dry eyes, likely from years of soft contact lens wear and heavy screen use, worsening my HOAs. And a referral to a specialty contact lens practice.
Second opinions matter. The right doctor at the right time changes everything.
The dry eye detour, finding community, and the hesitation phase
After the dry eye diagnosis, I spent months trying to fix things on my own: warm compresses morning and night, fish oil, switching to glasses more, reducing screen time, and every eye drop I could research. I even examined all medications I was taking, including finasteride, and stopped taking it for over a month to see if it was contributing to my symptoms. It made no difference. Nothing meaningfully moved the needle.
Even with a referral to a specialty contact lens practice in hand, I did not immediately follow through. The concerns stacked up: the costs would be significant, potentially several thousand dollars out of pocket in total. Most specialty practices are out-of-network by default. Insurance coverage would be difficult to obtain. It would require multiple visits. The practice required a significant commute from where I live. And from everything I was hearing, wavefront HOA correction technology does not appear to be covered by insurance currently. I kept trying dry eye treatments instead, and I wish I had pushed through those hesitations sooner.
During this period I found the Big Fat Scleral Lenses Facebook group, which as I mentioned was a genuine turning point. Real patients from around the world dealing with HOAs alongside dry eye and other conditions, sharing what had worked and what had not. The success stories there, particularly around scleral lenses and wavefront-guided HOA correction, gave me both direction and hope at a point when I had very little of either. If you are not already a member, I would strongly recommend it.
One thing that became clear through all this research: a stable scleral lens fit is a required foundation before wavefront HOA correction can be added. This is not just a preference; it is fundamental to how the process works. The scleral lens has to come first, and it has to be right.
I eventually made the call to the specialty practice, spoke with someone at the front desk who put me completely at ease, talked it through with my wife, and committed.
If you are sitting in that hesitation phase right now: go make the appointment.
What happened at the specialty practice
My first appointment was late December 2025. The initial exam was nearly two hours of focused one-on-one time, unlike anything I had experienced in eye care. I was scanned with a wavefront aberrometer (OVITZ xwave) at that very first appointment, showing my initial HOA readings in roughly the .5 to .8 range depending on the measurement and the trial lenses being evaluated.
My doctor took the approach this process requires: establish a stable base scleral lens first, then add the wavefront HOA correction once that foundation is solid. Over several visits and fitting revisions, she worked to minimize the HOA readings as much as possible before any correction was added. After that iterative process, we reached a stable scleral fit with readings settling in the .5 range. The sclerals alone made a meaningful difference, as nighttime starbursts and halos reduced significantly and daytime glare improved considerably. But residual starbursts remained and the computer ghosting persisted.
With the base fit confirmed stable, my doctor recommended adding wavefront HOA correction to the lenses. She also set my expectations honestly throughout, including noting that my HOA levels, while meaningful, were not as severe as many of the cases she had treated, so results might be more modest than the dramatic improvements some patients experience. She also told me the first corrected pair would likely need further adjustment.
First corrected pair: vision too blurry, needed additional corrections beyond the HOA optics, as standard astigmatism and eye power corrections also needed to be incorporated. Real disappointment, even with the expectation having been set. Went back, my doctor identified what was needed, new pair ordered.
Second corrected pair: transformative. Night vision completely changed. Daytime glare gone. Computer ghosting entirely gone. I should also note that there is a real acclimation period as your brain adjusts to the new visual input. My vision continued to improve over the first one to three weeks of wearing the corrected lenses, so patience is important here as well.
Latest aberrometry scan May 2026: HOAs under .20. Lab confirmed no further correction possible without introducing new aberrations. Testing at 20/15, the best vision of my life. Total visits: 4 to 5 spread over several months.
One important note on testing: some light sources produce halos and starbursts for most people, particularly those with any degree of astigmatism. Test across many different lighting situations before drawing conclusions on new lenses.
On the conservative treatment approach
At various points more aggressive surgical options could have come up. I am glad I went conservative. The daily commitment of specialty contact lenses is real, as acclimation takes time even as a lifelong contact wearer, but there was no risky irreversible procedure involved. The lenses can be updated and improved as the technology continues to advance. For me, that is the right tradeoff, and I would encourage anyone weighing options to think carefully about it.
The biggest surprise about scleral lenses I did not anticipate: how genuinely comfortable they are to wear. After the acclimation period they feel completely natural and I can wear them the entire day without issue. The insertion and extraction routine has become second nature.
The insurance reality
Most specialty contact lens practices are out-of-network with vision insurance by default. Even with a formal Letter of Medical Necessity and a diagnosed medical condition like Bilateral Irregular Astigmatism, expect minimal reimbursement and a real fight to get even that.
I want to be clear about something important: I went in-network first. I spent nearly a year at a vision insurance in-network provider before ultimately being referred to a specialty practice that was out-of-network. The in-network provider was genuinely trying to help but simply did not have the specialized equipment required to diagnose and treat my condition properly. That is a critical point that gets lost in the insurance conversation, being in-network does not mean being equipped to treat every condition a plan covers. On some of my previous posts about my story, some doctors have posted that this is a tough reality of the situation.
My vision insurance denied virtually everything despite a formal Letter of Medical Necessity. After a formal internal appeal they offered a token amount toward the total claim. I did not cash that check. I filed formal complaints with consumer protection bodies and notified my employer's benefits team. I want better outcomes for everyone facing this situation, not just myself.From what I have heard, wavefront HOA correction technology does not appear to be covered by insurance currently. I hope that can change. Plan for scleral lenses to be an ongoing annual replacement cost of approximately $1,000 or more. The insurance conversation does not end when you get your first pair.
Do not let cost be the reason you continue to suffer. The quality of life on the other side of this treatment is worth it.
What I want you to take away
- Irregular astigmatism can cause Higher Order Aberrations that standard glasses and soft contacts cannot correct, and most eye exams do not test for them
- A wavefront aberrometer is needed to properly diagnose and measure HOAs, not just a standard corneal topographer
- A stable scleral lens fit is a required foundation before wavefront HOA correction can be added, and understanding this sequence helps set realistic expectations for the process
- Scleral lenses alone can help significantly, but if residual symptoms remain after a stable fit, ask specifically about wavefront-guided HOA correction
- Expect that the first corrected pair may need adjustment; find a doctor who has done this before and communicates candidly about what to expect
- There is a real acclimation period after receiving corrected lenses; your brain needs time to adjust to the new visual input, and vision often continues to improve over the first one to three weeks
- Be your own advocate; get second opinions, trust your symptoms, and do not accept this is as good as it gets
- Going in-network first does not mean your condition can be fully treated in-network; ask specifically whether your provider has the specialized equipment your condition requires
- Patient communities like the Big Fat Scleral Lenses Facebook group are genuinely valuable; use them
- The financial and logistical barriers are real, but they are worth pushing through