Tweet
I found this article at the eye specialist that I will be visiting in MN for a second opinion on my dry and allergy eye.
http://www.nseyespecialists.com/index.cfm/PageID/4570
I never heard of this procedure before, but it seems 100% safter and better then Lasik. Why haven't I heard of this before or see it advertised?
I also found it interesting that they claim 29% of Lasik patients suffer from some version of dry eye. That is 1/3! That is not acceptable. Why is this not published more?
http://www.nseyespecialists.com/index.cfm/PageID/4570
I never heard of this procedure before, but it seems 100% safter and better then Lasik. Why haven't I heard of this before or see it advertised?
I also found it interesting that they claim 29% of Lasik patients suffer from some version of dry eye. That is 1/3! That is not acceptable. Why is this not published more?