There have been a lot of comments lately about "contact lens induced dry eye" and so I thought I'd open a little discussion about this. I do not have any useful knowledge in this area myself, so I would love to hear from those of you who do.
I'll kick it off with a couple of comments:
FIRST, I am usually somewhat skeptical when I see anyone posting that "XXX caused my dry eyes". Dry eye is a complex, multi-factorial, progressive disease. I'm not saying it can't be pinned down - but I think there's frequently more to it than "thus-and-such caused it". I think we can benefit from differentiating between causes, and triggers, or things that exacerbate (or reveal) an underlying or longstanding undetected conditions.
Consider this: even in the case of LASIK, where there are multiple PROVEN mechanisms by which the surgery causes dry eye, for so many of us there's much more to it. So, how much more with other causes/triggers that are not scientifically proven like LASIK is.
I guess my point is, if we are too quick to dismiss dry eyes as contact lens induced... and setting aside for the moment the scientific questions about that... we may shortchange ourselves when it comes to treatment. For example, a common pattern might be mild chronic MGD causing contact lens intolerance over the years. Just because your eyes don't get better when you stop wearing lenses doesn't mean the lenses on their own did permanent damage - IF there is concurrent stuff going on.
SECOND, I was kind of puzzled when looking for medical literature to explain the connection between contacts and dry eye. After talking with various people I am sensing a little paradox, which perhaps I can explain with a little dialogue....
MD: Well of course contacts cause dry eye. Not in everybody of course but the people who have really heavy use of contacts for many years.... Chronic hypoxia, relative anaesthesia, eventually neurotrophic keratopathy.
OD: Sure. Show me the studies. Contacts have been around for an awful lot of years, and if this is the case, surely it's been studied.
MD: Well, uh, nobody publishes it because, well, we all just know it and it's something no one wants to prove. Y'know, like all those big contact lens companies.
OD: But....
MD (interrupting): Oh and by the way you're not entitled to an opinion because you make your living from contacts.
OD: I see. My bad. By the way, congratulations on your most recent LASIK study in the Journal of Refractive Surgery. I don't suppose it was funded by VISX was it?
I'll kick it off with a couple of comments:
FIRST, I am usually somewhat skeptical when I see anyone posting that "XXX caused my dry eyes". Dry eye is a complex, multi-factorial, progressive disease. I'm not saying it can't be pinned down - but I think there's frequently more to it than "thus-and-such caused it". I think we can benefit from differentiating between causes, and triggers, or things that exacerbate (or reveal) an underlying or longstanding undetected conditions.
Consider this: even in the case of LASIK, where there are multiple PROVEN mechanisms by which the surgery causes dry eye, for so many of us there's much more to it. So, how much more with other causes/triggers that are not scientifically proven like LASIK is.
I guess my point is, if we are too quick to dismiss dry eyes as contact lens induced... and setting aside for the moment the scientific questions about that... we may shortchange ourselves when it comes to treatment. For example, a common pattern might be mild chronic MGD causing contact lens intolerance over the years. Just because your eyes don't get better when you stop wearing lenses doesn't mean the lenses on their own did permanent damage - IF there is concurrent stuff going on.
SECOND, I was kind of puzzled when looking for medical literature to explain the connection between contacts and dry eye. After talking with various people I am sensing a little paradox, which perhaps I can explain with a little dialogue....
MD: Well of course contacts cause dry eye. Not in everybody of course but the people who have really heavy use of contacts for many years.... Chronic hypoxia, relative anaesthesia, eventually neurotrophic keratopathy.
OD: Sure. Show me the studies. Contacts have been around for an awful lot of years, and if this is the case, surely it's been studied.
MD: Well, uh, nobody publishes it because, well, we all just know it and it's something no one wants to prove. Y'know, like all those big contact lens companies.
OD: But....
MD (interrupting): Oh and by the way you're not entitled to an opinion because you make your living from contacts.
OD: I see. My bad. By the way, congratulations on your most recent LASIK study in the Journal of Refractive Surgery. I don't suppose it was funded by VISX was it?
Comment